Stop the dirty politics and negative campaigns. It’s time for a change on City Council. Check out Stephen Gray and Tamara Goehler. They are qualified to represent US on City Council: Marcoisland2024election.com
We need people on our City Council that will listen to US! Stephen Gray and Tamara Goehler have pledged that. They have chosen to accept donations only from individuals – not businesses. They want to be beholden to YOU, residents of Marco Island.
They are fiscally responsible in running this campaign together. And they will be fiscally responsible when elected to the City Council. Being on the City Council is a four-year commitment. We don’t know what costs the City will be faced with. You can be assured that every expense will be reviewed before considering taxes. They will listen to YOU!
As a resident, I opposed City Council seeking more beach access between our condos and considering paid parking on private property (condos). Fortunately, both of these were stopped. Then came the trolley. Over several meetings this summer, residents testified loud and clear in opposition! But that did not stop Councilors Blonna and Irwin voting in favor of the trolley costing us taxpayers $206,000 versus putting it on the ballot for citizens to decide. COUNCILORS BLONNA AND IRWIN DID NOT LISTEN TO US!
Keywords
politics,
government,
politicians,
american politicians,
politics of the united states,
candidates for president of the united states,
american political people,
political positions of american politicians,
finance,
public sphere,
united states,
political positions of united states presidential candidates,
legislative branch of the united states government,
elections,
people associated with united states presidential elections,
political events,
american political candidates,
expense,
economy,
government finances,
political positions of politicians,
democracy,
accountability,
political science,
public finance,
governance,
republican party (united states),
political views,
financial accounting,
public policy,
presidencies,
executive branch of the government of the united states,
presidency of the united states,
members of the united states congress,
state governors of the united states,
income statement,
federal government of the united states,
public administration,
economy of the united states,
presidents of the united states,
heads of government,
united states presidential campaigns,
income,
law,
financial statements,
first families of the united states,
political activism,
political positions of united states senators,
economies,
political campaigning,
public economics,
activism,
financial reporting,
political ideologies,
political careers,
public law,
united states senate,
members of bicameral legislatures,
tax,
political families of the united states,
united states senators,
controversies,
political positions of members of the united states house of representatives,
political communication,
presidencies of the united states,
social institutions,
political law,
campaigning,
society of the united states,
national lower houses,
united states economic policy,
united states house of representatives,
political career of donald trump,
social conflict,
social movements,
money,
united states federal policy,
public sector,
republican party (united states) campaigns,
economic policy,
political controversies,
policy,
events,
political corruption,
donald trump,
advocacy,
national legislators,
election campaigning,
macroeconomic policy,
politics of north america,
members of the united states house of representatives,
presidency of donald trump,
trump family,
members of lower houses,
political economy,
taxation,
upper houses,
national upper houses,
members of upper houses,
executive branches of government,
professional ethics,
social issues,
republican party (united states) presidential campaigns,
governors and heads of sub-national entities,
right to petition,
politics of the united kingdom,
republican party presidents of the united states,
criticisms,
federalist parties,
statutory law,
events in,
american families,
political movements,
issues in ethics,
united states law,
ethically disputed political practices,
democratic party (united states) presidential campaigns,
republicans (united states),
american businesspeople,
donald trump controversies,
government of the united kingdom,
united states federal legislation,
north america,
prime ministers of canada,
westminster system governments,
members of the cabinet of the united states,
political funding,
nationalist heads of state or government,
conservatism,
fiscal policy,
democratic party (united states)
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here