Confronting Conspiracy TheoriesHave you heard about....?Of course you have. It’s been all over social media for months and if you didn’t see it there, someone in your family said something about it or a friend did, and you still think it’s untrue.It’s hard to fight nonsense, you know–although admittedly, it’s fun to read those fake“science”reports. So, get the new book“Pseudoscience”by Lydia Kang,MD and NatePedersen, go ahead, and indulge.“It’s okay to reserve judgment until the evidence is in.”When he was asked for his“gut feeling”on subjects that are unknown, the great Carl Saganusually answered with some version of those words. And, say Kang and Pedersen,“he’s right.”Waiting for correct, valid confirmation of facts is much better than overreacting and sharingwrong information. Waiting, say the authors, is the best thing to do, even though“staking aclaim”on information can make you“feel pretty good.”Take, for instance, the idea that the Earth is flat. If you disagree with that, well, you’re notalone: most flat-Earthers disagree with one another on various details. Either way you go, theauthors invite you to built a rocket ship andcheck for yourself.Hey, it’s happened.Spontaneous Human Combustion has a perfectly valid explanation. There’s some medical truthin certain kinds of body divination, but most of it’s hooey. Bumps on someone’s skull are goodindications of (are you readyfor this?)...bumps on their skull. Seeing ghosts may have basis inmedicine. Your birth month really has little to do with your personality. Cryptids“have beenreportedly seen but never with definitive proof.”The jury’s still out on cryogenics,but futuresuccesses are absolutely not guaranteed. Chickens can’t tell the future, and neither can theirentrails. And you can pretend to levitate,but actually doing it? Nope.So, here’s the thing about“Pseudoscience”:it’s not going to change any minds. No matter howmany times you show someone what’s inside this book, it very likely won’t make one bit ofdifference in anyone’s logic either way.The appeal, instead, probably lies with someone who believes the truth and enjoys thinkingabout these“crackpot ideas”anyhow because, paraphrasing Sagan, judgment can be withheld,and it’s okay. It’s even fun to read about that which authors Kang and Pedersen put to rest,once and for (maybe) all, and to think about the“but’s”.The other good news is that there are alot of paranormal, weird, odd, unexplained events thathave happened around the world and throughout time that are not in“Pseudoscience.”Thatjust means that there’s plenty of room for enjoying other wild stories and ideas, still plenty ofwhat-iffing,and giving your imagination a workout.Keep in mind that“Pseudoscience”is not just for skeptics; it’s full of answering chapters fordoubters, but also for anyone who collects and loves conspiracy theories, and for your favorite
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here